Jolly LLB 3 (2025): Two Jollys, One Courtroom

The third chapter of the Jolly LLB series hits theaters with a unique twist. Director Subhash Kapoor decided to bring both Akshay Kumar and Arshad Warsi together this time. Saurabh Shukla returns as the judge who commands every scene he appears in.

This September 19, 2025 release features Huma Qureshi, Amrita Rao, and Annu Kapoor in supporting roles. The film attempts something different by putting two lawyers with the same nickname in one courtroom. It deals with how farmers lose their land to big companies through questionable legal tactics.

What Happens in the Film

A farmer named Rajaram Solanki faces a nightmare when powerful people take his land. The builder behind this has grand plans that require pushing farmers out of their homes. When Rajaram dies tragically, his wife Janaki decides to challenge the system in court.

Two lawyers named Jolly enter the picture – Jagdish Tyagi and Jagdishwar Mishra. They start as rivals fighting for the same case, creating funny situations. The movie explores how wealthy corporations bend rules to grab property from helpless farming families.

The opening half shows both lawyers trying to outsmart each other. Their ego clashes bring humor while the real tragedy plays out in the background. As the legal battle heats up, they face powerful opponents who control officials and manipulate laws.

How the Actors Perform

Akshay Kumar plays Jagdishwar Mishra with his usual confidence and energy. His verbal battles with Warsi’s character provide entertainment throughout. Kumar handles emotional scenes well, though I found his performance familiar from his earlier roles. He holds your attention whenever he’s on screen.

Arshad Warsi returns as Jagdish Tyagi and makes it look easy. His approach feels natural and believable, showing how his character has evolved. I really enjoyed watching Warsi deliver clever lines with perfect timing. The combination of both actors creates magic that keeps you hooked.

Saurabh Shukla dominates as Judge Tripathi, making you forget everyone else momentarily. His dialogue delivery and expressions bring authority to courtroom moments. Huma Qureshi and Amrita Rao do what they can with limited material. Other actors in smaller roles contribute adequately to the story.

What Works Well

The film addresses land grabbing issues without making it feel like a lecture. Kapoor’s writing mixes serious topics with moments that make you laugh out loud. The courtroom battles, though not as frequent, remain engaging and well-executed.

The dialogue writing stands out, giving actors lines that are both funny and meaningful. I liked how the film shows connections between business interests and dishonest officials. The latter half gets emotionally stronger with scenes that show what farmers actually go through.

Camera work captures the contrast between formal courtrooms and simple village settings nicely. Music supports the mood without becoming distracting or too loud. Quality production shows throughout, making everything look professional and polished.

Where It Disappoints

The plot doesn’t match the strength of the first two films. I really missed the intense legal arguments that made the franchise special initially. Middle portions drag because the story keeps circling around the same land problem.

Female characters get very little depth or importance in the narrative. Both Qureshi and Rao deserved roles with more substance and screen presence. The social message sometimes becomes too obvious, hurting the film’s entertainment factor.

You can guess certain plot developments before they happen, which reduces surprises. Some jokes miss their mark and feel unnecessarily added to scenes. I thought the filmmaking approach needed more innovation compared to what we’ve seen before.

What Others Are Saying

News18 gave it 4 stars, highlighting how it handles serious topics with humor. IMDb users rated it 7.9/10, with praise for how both leads work together. Several viewers mentioned it entertains but doesn’t reach the heights of previous installments.

The Hollywood Reporter India criticized it as the weakest film in the series. Their review pointed out that good intentions don’t save the weak screenplay. Rotten Tomatoes showed critics giving around 3.5/5 stars with mixed feelings overall.

123Telugu appreciated the acting but felt the narrative becomes repetitive eventually. Public response varied widely – loyal fans wanted more while casual viewers thought it was acceptable. The message about farmers connected with audiences despite storytelling problems.